Basic and Applied Herpetology, vol. 25, pp. 5-32, 2011

Geometric morphometrics in herpetology: modern tools for enhancing the study of morphological variation in amphibians and reptiles
Antigoni Kaliontzopoulou 

 CIBIO/UP, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Campus Agrario de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal. antigoni@mail.icav.up.pt
http://dx.doi.org/10.11160/bah.11016                                                                                Full text (PDF) 

The use of geometric morphometrics for studying phenotypic variation in amphibians and reptiles has visibly increased in the last decade. These modern tools provide a robust statistical framework to study organismal shape while preserving the geometric properties of the studied structures and thus improve our capacity for investigating patterns of morphological variation, and understanding their ecological and historical causes. Their application in herpetology has shed new light to the remarkable diversity observed among extant and extinct amphibians and reptiles. Here I first briefly consider the historical emergence of geometric morphometric methods, trying to provide a practical guide for herpetologists interested in implementing these tools to their investigation. I then review the wide array of published studies using geometric morphometrics to investigate morphological patterns in amphibians and reptiles. Across different investigation fields, an emergent pattern is the existence of general similarities, but also profound differences, among members of higher taxonomic groups. Size-shape allometry is a common pattern in many groups, but remarkable variation of allometric trajectories exists among closely related taxa. Sexual dimorphism has been extensively studied in reptiles, but less so in amphibians, while the contrary is true for phenotypic plasticity. The use of geometric morphometrics has allowed the detection of potentially adaptive shape patterns and the investigation of their causes. Finally, these methods have been invaluable in the study of fossils and have provided a better understanding of the paleobiology of extinct taxa.
Published online: 20 December 2011


· Adams, D.C. (2004). Character displacement via aggressive interference in Appalachian salamanders. Ecology 85: 2664-2670. CrossRef

· Adams, D.C. (2010). Parallel evolution of character displacement driven by competitive selection in terrestrial salamanders. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 72.CrossRef

· Adams, D.C. (2011). Quantitative genetics and evolution of head shape in Plethodon salamanders. Evolutionary Biology 38: 278-286. CrossRef

· Adams, D.C. & Collyer, M.L. (2009). A general framework for the analysis of phenotypic trajectories in evolutionary studies. Evolution 63: 1143-1154. CrossRef

· Adams, D.C. & Nistri, A. (2010). Ontogenetic convergence and evolution of foot morphology in European cave salamanders (Family: Plethodontidae). BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 216. CrossRef

· Adams, D.C. & Rohlf, F.J. (2000). Ecological character displacement in Plethodon: Biomechanical differences found from a geometric morphometric study.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97: 4106-4111. CrossRef

· Adams, D.C. & Rosenberg, M.S. (1998). Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: a comment on Fink and Zelditch (1995). Systematic Biology 47: 168-173.CrossRef

· Adams, D.C.; Rohlf, F.J. & Slice, D.E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology 71: 5-16.CrossRef

· Adams, D.C.; West, M.E. & Collyer, M.L. (2007). Location-specific sympatric morphological divergence as a possible response to species interactions in West Virginia Plethodon salamander communities. Journal of Animal Ecology 76: 289-295. CrossRef

· Adams, D.C.; Cardini, A.; Monteiro, L.R.; O’Higgins, P. & Rohlf, F.J. (2011). Morphometrics and phylogenetics: principal components of shape from cranial modules are neither appropriate nor effective cladistic characters. Journal of Human Evolution 60: 240-243. CrossRef

· Angielczyk, K.D. (2007). How to be a miniature turtle: comparisons of ontogeny in the Emydinae using geometric morphometrics. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46 (supplement 1): e3.
· Angielczyk, K.D. & Sheets, H.D. (2007). Investigation of simulated tectonic deformation in fossils using geometric morphometrics. Paleobiology 33: 125-148.CrossRef

· Angielczyk, K.D.; Feldman, C.R. & Miller, G.R. (2011). Adaptive evolution of plastron shape in emydine turtles. Evolution 65: 377-394. CrossRef 

· Arendt, J. (2010). Morphological correlates of sprint swimming speed in five species of spadefoot toad tadpoles: Comparison of morphometric methods. Journal of Morphology 271: 1044-1052. CrossRef 

· Arif, S.; Adams, D.C. & Wicknick, J.A. (2007). Bioclimatic modelling, morphology, and behaviour reveal alternative mechanisms regulating the distributions of two parapatric salamander species. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9: 843-854. CrossRef 

· Ashlock, D.; Adams, D.C. & Doty, D. (2003). Morphometric grayscale texture analysis using foot patterns. Proceedings of the 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation: 1575-1582.

· Băncilǎ, R.; Van Gelder, I.; Rotteveel, E.; Loman, J. & Arntzen, J.W. (2010). Fluctuating asymmetry is a function of population isolation in island lizards. Journal of Zoology 282: 266-275. CrossRef 

· Barden, H.E. & Maidment, S.C.R. (2011). Evidence for sexual dimorphism in the stegosaurian dinosaur Kentrosaurus aethiopicus from the Upper Jurassic of Tanzania. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 31: 641-651. CrossRef 

· Baszio, S. & Weber, S. (2002). Potentials and limits of morphometry in the understanding of squamate osteological structures. Senckenbergiana lethaea 82: 13-22.

· Birch, J.M. (1999). Skull allometry in the marine toad, Bufo marinusJournal of Morphology 241: 115-126CrossRef
· Bonnan, M.F. (2004). Morphometric analysis of humerus and femur shape in Morrison sauropods: implications for functional morphology and paleobiology.Paleobiology 30: 444-470. CrossRef
· Bonnan, M.F. (2007). Linear and geometric morphometric analysis of long bone scaling patterns in Jurassic neosauropod dinosaurs: their functional and paleobiological implications. The Anatomical Record 290: 1089-1111. CrossRef 

· Bonnan, M.F.; Farlow, J.O. & Masters, S.L. (2008). Using linear and geometric morphometrics to detect intraspecific variability and sexual dimorphism in femoral shape in Alligator mississippiensis and its implications for sexing fossil archosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 28: 422-431. CrossRef

· Bonnan, M.F.; Sandrik, J.L.; Nishiwaki, T.; Wilhite, D.R.; Elsey, R.M. & Vittore, C. (2010). Calcified cartilage shape in archosaur long bones reflects overlying joint shape in stress-bearing elements: Implications for nonavian dinosaur locomotion. The Anatomical Record 293: 2044-2055. CrossRef 

· Bookstein, F.L. (1986). Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Statistical Science 1: 181-222. CrossRef

· Bookstein, F.L. (1989a). “Size and shape”: a comment on semantics. Systematic Zoology 38: 173-180. CrossRef

· Bookstein, F.L. (1989b). Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11: 567-585. CrossRef

· Bookstein, F.L. (1991). Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

· Bookstein, F.L. (1994). Can biometrical shape be a homologous character?, In B.K. Hall (ed.) Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 197-227.

· Bookstein, F.L. (1996). Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 58: 313-365. CrossRef

· Bookstein, F.L. (1997). Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis 1: 225-243.CrossRef

· Bruner, E. & Costantini, D. (2007). Head morphological variation in Podarcis muralis and Podarcis sicula: a landmark-based approach. Amphibia-Reptilia 28: 566-573. CrossRef

· Bruner, E.; Costantini, D.; Fanfani, A. & Dell’Omo, G. (2005). Morphological variation and sexual dimorphism of the cephalic scales in Lacerta bilineataActa Zoologica 86: 245-254. CrossRef

· Burke, A.C. (1989). Development of the turtle carapace: implications for the evolution of a novel Bauplan. Journal of Morphology 199: 363-378. CrossRef

· Candioti, M.F.V. (2006). Ecomorphological guilds in anuran larvae: an application of geometric morphometric methods. Herpetological Journal 16: 149-162.

· Candioti, M.F.V. (2008). Larval anatomy of Andean tadpoles of Telmatobius (Anura: Ceratophryidae) from Northwestern Argentina. Zootaxa 1938: 40-60.

· Canudo, J.I. & Cuenca-Bescós, G. (2004). Morphometric approach to Titanosauriformes (Sauropoda, Dinosauria) femora: implications to the paleobiogeographic analysis, In A.M.T. Elewa (ed.) Morphometrics: Applications in Biology and Paleontology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 143-156.

· Ceballos, C.P. & Valenzuela, N. (2011). The role of sex-specific plasticity in shaping sexual dimorphism in a long-lived vertebrate, the snapping turtle Chelydra serpentinaEvolutionary Biology 38: 163-181. CrossRef

· Chiari, Y. & Claude, J. (2011). Study of the carapace shape and growth in two Galápagos tortoise lineages. Journal of Morphology 272: 379-386. CrossRef

· Claude, J. (2008). Morphometrics with R. Springer, New York.

· Claude, J.; Paradis, E.; Tong, H. & Auffray, J.-C. (2003). A geometric morphometric assessment of the effects of environment and cladogenesis on the evolution of the turtle shell. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 485-501. CrossRef

· Claude, J.; Pritchard, P..C.H.; Tong, H.; Paradis, E. & Auffray, J.-C. (2004). Ecological correlates and evolutionary divergence in the skull of turtles: a geometric morphometric assessment. Systematic Biology 53: 933-948. CrossRef

· Clemente-Carvalho, R.B.G.; Monteiro, L.R.; Bonato, V.; Rocha, H.S.; Pereira, G.R.; Oliveira, D.F.; Lopes, R.T.; Haddad, C.F.B.; Martins, E.G. & dos Reis, S.F. (2008). Geographic variation in cranial shape in the pumpkin toadlet (Brachycephalus ephippium): a geometric analysis. Journal of Herpetology 42: 176-185.CrossRef

· Clemente-Carvalho, R.B.G.; Alves, A.C.R.; Perez, S.I.; Haddad, C.F.B. & dos Reis, S.F. (2011). Morphological and molecular variation in the pumpkin toadlet,Brachycephalus ephippium (Anura: Brachycephalidae). Journal of Herpetology 45: 94-99. CrossRef

· Collyer, M.L. & Adams, D.C. (2007). Analysis of two-state multivariate phenotypic change in ecological studies. Ecology 88: 683-692. CrossRef

· Costa, C.; Angelini, C.; Scardi, M.; Menesatti, P. & Utzeri, C. (2009). Using image analysis on the ventral colour pattern in Salamandrina perspicillata (Amphibia: Salamandridae) to discriminate among populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 96: 35-43. CrossRef

· Costantini, D.; Bruner, E.; Fanfani, A. & Dell’Omo, G. (2007). Male-biased predation of western green lizards by Eurasian kestrels. Naturwissenschaften 94: 1015-1020. CrossRef

· Costantini, D., Lapresa Alonso, M., Moazen, M. & Bruner, E. (2010). The relationship between cephalic scales and bones in lizards: a preliminary microtomographic survey on three lacertid species. The Anatomical Record 293: 183-194. CrossRef
· Dayton, G.H.; Saenz, D.; Baum, K.A.; Langerhans, R.B. & DeWitt, T.J. (2005). Body shape, burst speed and escape behavior of larval anurans. Oikos 111: 582-591. CrossRef

· Daza, J.D.; Herrera, A.; Thomas, R. & Claudio, H.J. (2009). Are you what you eat? A geometric morphometric analysis of gekkotan skull shape. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 97: 677-707. CrossRef

· Depecker, M.; Berge, C.; Penin, X. & Renous, S. (2006). Geometric morphometrics of the shoulder girdle in extant turtles (Chelonii). Journal of Anatomy 208: 35-45. CrossRef

· Dryden, I.L. & Mardia, K.V. (1998). Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom.

· Elewa, A.M.T. (2004). Introduction, In A.M.T. Elewa (ed.) Morphometrics: Applications in Biology and PaleontologySpringer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1-6.

· Emerson, S.B. & Bramble, D.M. (1993). Scaling, allometry, and skull design, In J. Hanken & B.K. Hall (eds.) The Skull. Volume 3. Functional and Evolutionary Mechanisms. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 384-421.

· Ferson, S.; Rohlf, F.J. & Koehn, R.K. (1985). Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. Systematic Zoology 34: 59-68. CrossRef

· Garriga, N. & Llorente, G.A. (in press). Chondrocranial ontogeny of Pelodytes punctatus (Anura: Pelodytidae). Response to competition: geometric morphometric and allometric change analysis. Acta Zoologica doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2011.00520.x. CrossRef

· Gentilli, A.; Cardini, A.; Fontaneto, D. & Zuffi, M.A.L. (2009). The phylogenetic signal in cranial morphology of Vipera aspis: a contribution from geometric morphometrics. Herpetological Journal 19: 69-77.

· Gosner, K.L. (1960). A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183-190.

· Gould, S.J. (1966). Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Reviews 41: 587-640. CrossRef

· Harmon, L.J.; Kolbe, J.J.; Cheverud, J.M. & Losos, J.B. (2005). Convergence and the multidimensional niche. Evolution 59: 409-421. CrossRef

· Head, J.J.; Bloch, J.I.; Hastings, A.K.; Bourque, J.R.; Cadena, E.A.; Herrera, F.A.; Polly, P.D. & Jaramillo, C.A. (2009). Giant boid snake from the Palaeocene neotropics reveals hotter past equatorial temperatures. Nature 457: 715-717. CrossRef

· Herrel, A.; McBrayer, L.D. & Larson, P.M. (2007). Functional basis for sexual differences in bite force in the lizard Anolis carolinensisBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 91: 111-119. CrossRef

· Hossie, T.J.; Ferland-Raymond, B.; Burness, G. & Murray, D.L. (2010). Morphological and behavioural responses of frog tadpoles to perceived predation risk: A possible role for corticosterone mediation? Ecoscience 17: 100-108. CrossRef

· Huyghe, K.; Herrel, A.; Adriaens, D.; Tadić, Z. & Van Damme, R. (2009). It is all in the head: morphological basis for differences in bite force among colour morphs of the Dalmatian wall lizard. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 96: 13-22. CrossRef

· Ivanović, A.; Vukov, T.D.; Džukić, G.; Tomašević, N. & Kalezić, M.L. (2007). Ontogeny of skull size and shape changes within a framework of biphasic lifestyle: a case study in six Triturus species (Amphibia, Salamandridae). Zoomorphology 126: 173-183. CrossRef

· Ivanović, A.; Sotiropoulos, K.; Vukov, T.D.; Eleftherakos, K.; Džukić, G.; Polymeni, R.M. & Kalezić, M.L. (2008). Cranial shape variation and molecular phylogenetic structure of crested newts (Triturus cristatus superspecies: Caudata, Salamandridae) in the Balkans. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95: 348-360. CrossRef

· Ivanović, A.; Sotiropoulos, K.; Džukić, G. & Kalezić, M.L. (2009). Skull size and shape variation versus molecular phylogeny: a case study of alpine newts (Mesotriton alpestris, Salamandridae) from the Balkan Peninsula. Zoomorphology 128: 157-167. CrossRef

· Ivanović, A.; Cvijanović, M. & Kalezić, M.L. (2011). Ontogeny of body form and metamorphosis: insights from the crested newts. Journal of Zoology 283: 153-161.CrossRef 

· Jaekel, M. & Wake, D.B. (2007). Developmental processes underlying the evolution of a derived foot morphology in salamandersProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 20437-20442. CrossRef

· Jamniczky, H.A. & Russell, A.P. (2004). A geometric morphometric assessment of the ‘batagurine process’ of testudinoid turtles. Amphibia-Reptilia 25: 369-379.CrossRef

· Johnson, J.B.; Burt, D.B. & DeWitt, T.J. (2008). Form, function, and fitness: pathways to survival. Evolution 62: 1243-1251. CrossRef

· Jones, M.E.H. (2008). Skull shape and feeding strategy in Sphenodon and other Rhynchocephalia (Diapsida: Lepidosauria). Journal of Morphology 269: 945-966.CrossRef

· Jorgensen, M.E. & Sheil C.A. (2008). Effects of temperature regime through premetamorphic ontogeny on shape of the chondrocranium in the American toad,Anaxyrus americanusThe Anatomical Record 291: 818-826. CrossRef

· Kaliontzopoulou, A.; Adams, D.C.; van der Meijden, A.; Perera, A. & Carretero, M.A. (in press). Relationships between head morphology, bite performance and ecology in two species of Podarcis wall lizards. Evolutionary Ecology DOI: 10.1007/s10682-011-9538-y. CrossRef

· Kaliontzopoulou, A.; Carretero, M.A. & Llorente, G.A. (2007). Multivariate and geometric morphometrics in the analysis of sexual dimorphism variation inPodarcis lizards. Journal of Morphology 268: 152-165. CrossRef

· Kaliontzopoulou, A.; Carretero, M.A. & Llorente, G.A. (2008). Head shape allometry and proximate causes of head sexual dimorphism in Podarcis lizards: joining linear and geometric morphometrics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93: 111-124. CrossRef

· Kaliontzopoulou, A.; Carretero, M.A. & Llorente, G.A. (2010). Intraspecific ecomorphological variation: linear and geometric morphometrics reveal habitat-related patterns within Podarcis bocagei wall lizards. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 1234-1244. CrossRef

· Kendall, D.G. (1984). Shape-manifolds, Procrustean metrics, and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 16: 81-121. CrossRef

· Kendall, D.G. (1985). Exact distributions for shapes of random triangles in convex sets. Advances in Applied Probability 17: 308-329. CrossRef

· Klingenberg, C.P. (1996). Multivariate allometry, In L.F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G.J.P. Naylor & D.E. Slice (eds.) Advances in Morphometrics. Series: NATO ASI Series A: Life Sciences, vol. 284. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 23-49.

· Klingenberg, C.P. (2003). Quantitative genetics of geometric shape: heritability and the pitfalls of the univariate approach. Evolution 57: 191-195. CrossRef

· Klingenberg, C.P. (2010). There’ s something afoot in the evolution of ontogenies. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 221. CrossRef

· Klingenberg, C.P. (2011). MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 353-357. CrossRef

· Klingenberg, C.P. & Gidaszewski, N.A. (2010). Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Systematic Biology 59: 245-261. CrossRef

· Klingenberg, C.P. & Monteiro, L.R. (2005). Distances and directions in multidimensional shape spaces: implications for morphometric applications. Systematic Biology 54: 678-688. CrossRef

· Larson, P.M. (2002). Chondrocranial development in larval Rana sylvatica (Anura: Ranidae): morphometric analysis of cranial allometry and ontogenetic shape change. Journal of Morphology 252: 131-144. CrossRef

· Larson, P.M. (2004). Chondrocranial morphology and ontogenetic allometry in larval Bufo americanus (Anura, Bufonidae). Zoomorphology 123: 95-106. CrossRef

· Larson, P.M. (2005). Ontogeny, phylogeny, and morphology in anuran larvae: morphometric analysis of cranial development and evolution in Rana tadpoles (Anura: Ranidae). Journal of Morphology 264: 34-52. CrossRef

· Lawing, A.M. & Polly, P.D. (2010). Geometric morphometrics: recent applications to the study of evolution and development. Journal of Zoology 280: 1-7.CrossRef

· Leaché, A.D.; Koo, M.S.; Spencer, C.L.; Papenfuss, T.J.; Fisher, R.N. & McGuire, J.A. (2009). Quantifying ecological, morphological, and genetic variation to delimit species in the coast horned lizard species complex (Phrynosoma). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106: 12418-12423. CrossRef

· Ljubisavljević, K.; Urošević, A.; Aleksić, I. & Ivanović, A. (2010). Sexual dimorphism of skull shape in a lacertid lizard species (Podarcis spp., Dalmatolacerta sp.,Dinarolacerta sp.) revealed by geometric morphometrics. Zoology 113: 168-174. CrossRef

· Ljubisavljević, K.; Polović, L.; Urošević, A. & Ivanović, A. (2011). Patterns of morphological variation in the skull and cephalic scales of the lacertid lizardAlgyroides nigropunctatusHerpetological Journal 21: 65-72.

· Lubiana, A. & Ferreira Júnior, P.D. (2009). Pivotal temperature and sexual dimorphism of Podocnemis expansa hatchlings (Testudines: Podocnemididae) from Bananal Island, Brazil. Zoologia 26: 527-533. CrossRef

· Maerz, J.C.; Myers, E.M. & Adams, D.C. (2006). Trophic polymorphism in a terrestrial salamander. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8: 23-35.
· Magwene, P.M. (2001). Comparing ontogenetic trajectories using growth process data. Systematic Biology 50: 640-656. CrossRef

· Manier, M.K. (2004). Geographic variation in the long-nosed snake Rhinocheilus lecontei (Colubridae): beyond the subspecies debate. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 83: 65-85. CrossRef

· Marcus, L.F. (1990). Traditional morphometrics, In F.J. Rohlf & F.L. Bookstein (eds.) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Series: Special Publications, vol. 2. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp. 77-122.

· Mitteroecker, P. & Gunz, P. (2009). Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evolutionary Biology 36: 235-247. CrossRef

· Monteiro, L.R. (1999). Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Systematic Biology48: 192-199. CrossRef

· Monteiro, L.R. (2000). Why morphometrics is special: the problem with using partial warps as characters for phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology 49: 796-800. CrossRef

· Monteiro, L.R. & Abe, A.S. (1997). Allometry and morphological integration in the skull of Tupinambis merianae (Lacertilia: Teiidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 18: 397-405. CrossRef

· Monteiro, L.R.; Cavalcanti, M.J. & Sommer III, H.J.S. (1997). Comparative ontogenetic shape changes in the skull of Caiman species (Crocodylia, Alligatoridae).Journal of Morphology 231: 53-62. CrossRef
· Monteiro, L.R.; Diniz-Filho, J.A.F.; dos Reis, S.F. & Araújo, E.D. (2002). Geometric estimates of heritability in biological shape. Evolution 56: 563-572. CrossRef

· Myers, E.M. & Adams, D.C. (2008). Morphology is decoupled from interspecific competition in Plethodon salamanders in the Shenandoah Mountains, USA.Herpetologica 64: 281-289. CrossRef 

· Myers, E.M.; Janzen, F.J.; Adams, D.C. & Tucker, J.K. (2006). Quantitative genetics of plastron shape in slider turtles (Trachemys scripta). Evolution 60: 563-572.
· Myers, E.M.; Tucker, J.K. & Chandler, C.H. (2007). Experimental analysis of body size and shape during critical life-history events of hatchling slider turtles,Trachemys scripta elegansFunctional Ecology 21: 1106-1114. CrossRef

· Nishizawa, H.; Asahara, M.; Kamezaki, N. & Arai, N. (2010). Differences in the skull morphology between juvenile and adult green turtles: implications for the ontogenetic diet shift. Current Herpetology 29: 97-101. CrossRef

· O’Higgins, P. & Jones, N. (2006). Tools for Statistical Shape Analysis. Hull York Medical School, York-Hull, United Kingdom. Available athttp://sites.google.com/site/hymsfme/resources.

· Pierce, S.E.; Angielczyk, K.D. & Rayfield, E.J. (2008). Patterns of morphospace occupation and mechanical performance in extant crocodilian skulls: a combined geometric morphometric and finite element modeling approach. Journal of Morphology 269: 840-864. CrossRef

· Pierce, S.E.; Angielczyk, K.D. & Rayfield, E.J. (2009a). Morphospace occupation in thalattosuchian crocodylomorphs: skull shape variation, species delineation and temporal patterns. Palaeontology 52: 1057-1097. CrossRef

· Pierce, S.E.; Angielczyk, K.D. & Rayfield, E.J. (2009b). Shape and mechanics in thalattosuchian (Crocodylomorpha) skulls: implications for feeding behaviour and niche partitioning. Journal of Anatomy 215: 555-576. CrossRef

· Piras, P.; Colangelo, P.; Adams, D.C.; Buscalioni, A.; Cubo, J.; Kotsakis, T.; Meloro, C. & Raia, P. (2010). The GavialisTomistoma debate: the contribution of skull ontogenetic allometry and growth trajectories to the study of crocodylian relationships. Evolution & Development 12: 568-579. CrossRef

· Polly, P.D. & Head, J.J. (2004). Maximum-likelihood identification of fossils: taxonomic identification of Quaternary marmots (Rodentia, Mammalia) and identification of vertebral position in the pipesnake Cylindrophis (Serpentes, Reptilia), In A.M.T. Elewa (ed.) Morphometrics: Applications in Biology and Paleontology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 197-222.

· Prieto-Marquez, A.; Gignac, P.M. & Joshi, S. (2007). Neontological evaluation of pelvic skeletal attributes purported to reflect sex in extinct non-avian archosaurs.Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27: 603-609. CrossRef

· Pritchard, P.C.H. (2008). Evolution and structure of the turtle shell, In J. Wyneken, M.H. Godfrey & V. Bels (eds.) Biology of Turtles. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp. 45-83.

· R Development Core Team (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.r-project.org/.

· Raia, P.; Guarino, F.M.; Turano, M.; Polese, G.; Rippa, D.; Carotenuto, F.; Monti, D.M.; Cardi, M. & Fulgione, D. (2010). The blue lizard spandrel and the island syndrome. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 289. CrossRef

· Rivera, G. (2008). Ecomorphological variation in shell shape of the freshwater turtle Pseudemys concinna inhabiting different aquatic flow regimes. Integrative and Comparative Biology 48: 769-787. CrossRef

· Rivera, G. & Claude, J. (2008). Environmental media and shape asymmetry: a case study on turtle shells. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 94: 483-489.CrossRef

· Rivera, G. & Stayton, C.T. (2011). Finite element modeling of shell shape in the freshwater turtle Pseudemys concinna reveals a trade-off between mechanical strength and hydrodynamic efficiency. Journal of Morphology 272: 1192-1203. CrossRef

· Rodrigues, L.A. & Faria dos Santos, V. (2004). Sauropod Tracks – a geometric morphometric study, In A.M.T. Elewa (ed.) Morphometrics: Applications in Biology and Paleontology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 129-142.

· Rohlf, F.J. (1986). Relationships among eigenshape analysis, Fourier analysis, and analysis of coordinates. Mathematical Geology 18: 845-854. CrossRef

· Rohlf, F.J. (1990). Fitting curves to outlines, In F.J. Rohlf & F.L. Bookstein (eds.) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Series: Special Publications, Vol. 2. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp. 167-177.

· Rohlf, F.J. (1998). On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Systematic Biology 47: 147-158. CrossRef

· Rohlf, F.J. (1999). Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification 16: 197-223. CrossRef

· Rohlf, F.J. (2000a). On the use of shape spaces to compare morphometric methods. Hystrix 11: 9-25.
· Rohlf, F.J. (2000b). Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 111: 463-478. CrossRef
· Rohlf, F.J. (2003). Bias and errors in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics. Journal of Human Evolution 44: 665-683. CrossRef

· Rohlf, F.J. (2011). Morphometrics at SUNY Stony Brook. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York, USA. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.

· Rohlf, F.J. & Archie, J.W. (1984). A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Systematic Zoology33: 302-317. CrossRef

· Rohlf, F.J. & Bookstein, F.L. (1987). A comment on shearing as a method for “size correction”. Systematic Zoology 36: 356-367. CrossRef

· Rohlf, F.J. & Marcus, L.F. (1993). A revolution morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 129-132. CrossRef

· Rohlf, F.J. & Slice, D. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59. CrossRef

· Sheets, H.D. (2000). Integrated Morphometrics Package (IMP). Canisius College, Buffalo, New York, USA. Available at http://www2.canisius.edu/~sheets/.

· Siegel, A.F. & Benson, R.H. (1982). A robust comparison of biological shapes. Biometrics 38: 341-350. CrossRef

· Slice, D.E. (2001). Landmark coordinates aligned by Procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall’s shape space. Systematic Biology 50: 141-149. CrossRef

· Slice, D.E. (2005). Modern morphometrics, In D.E. Slice (ed.) Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. Series: Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects (R.H. Tuttle, ed.). Kluwer Academics / Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 1-46. CrossRef

· Slice, D.E.; Bookstein, F.L.; Marcus, L.F. & Rohlf, F.J. (1996). Appendix I. A glossary for geometric morphometrics, In L.F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G.J.P. Naylor & D.E. Slice (eds.) Advances in Morphometrics. Series: NATO ASI Series A: Life Sciences, vol. 284. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 531-551.

· Smith, M.T. & Collyer, M.L. (2008). Regional variation and sexual dimorphism in head form of the prairie rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis viridis): comparisons using new analytical techniques and collection methods, In W.K. Hayes, K.R. Beaman, M.D. Cardwell & S.P. Bush (eds.) The Biology of Rattlesnakes. Loma Linda University Press, Loma Linda, California, USA, pp. 79-90.

· Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995). Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman, New York.

· Stayton, C.T. (2005). Morphological evolution of the lizard skull: A geometric morphometrics survey. Journal of Morphology 263: 47-59. CrossRef

· Stayton, C.T. (2006). Testing hypotheses of convergence with multivariate data: morphological and functional convergence among herbivorous lizards. Evolution60: 824-841.

· Stayton, C.T. (2009). Application of thin-plate spline transformations to finite element models, or, how to turn a bog turtle into a spotted turtle to analyze both.Evolution 63: 1348-1355.  CrossRef

· Stayton, C.T. (2011). Biomechanics on the half shell: functional performance influences patterns of morphological variation in the emydid turtle carapace. Zoology114: 213-223. CrossRef

· Stayton, C.T. & Ruta, M. (2006). Geometric morphometrics of the skull roof of stereospondyls (Amphibia: Temnospondyli). Palaeontology 49: 307-337. CrossRef

· Thompson, D.W. (1917). On Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

· Valenzuela, N.; Adams, D.C.; Bowden, R.M. & Gauger, A.C. (2004). Geometric morphometric sex estimation for hatchling turtles: a powerful alternative for detecting subtle sexual shape dimorphism. Copeia 2004: 735-742. CrossRef

· Van Buskirk, J. (2009). Natural variation in morphology of larval amphibians: Phenotypic plasticity in nature? Ecological Monographs 79: 681-705. CrossRef

· Vidal, M.A.; Ortiz, J.C.; Ramírez, C.C. & Lamborot, M. (2005). Intraspecific variation in morphology and sexual dimorphism in Liolaemus tenuis (Tropiduridae).Amphibia-Reptilia 26: 343-351. CrossRef

· Vidal, M.A.; Veloso, A. & Méndez, M.A. (2006). Insular morphological divergence in the lizard Liolaemus pictus (Liolaemidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 27: 103-111.CrossRef

· Vieira, K.S.; Arzabe, C.; Hernández, M.I.M. & Vieira, W.L.S. (2008). An examination of morphometric variations in a neotropical toad population (Proceratophrys cristiceps, Amphibia, Anura, Cycloramphidae). PloS ONE 3: e3934. CrossRef

· Wells, K.D. (2007). The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. CrossRef

· Witzmann, F.; Scholz, H. & Ruta, M. (2009). Morphospace occupation of temnospondyl growth series: a geometric morphometric approach. Alcheringa 33: 237-255. CrossRef

· Young, M.T. & Larvan, M.D. (2010). Macroevolutionary trends in the skull of sauropodomorph dinosaurs – the largest terrestrial animals to have ever lived, InA.M.T. Elewa (ed.) Morphometrics for Nonmorpometricians. Series: Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol. 124. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 259-269.

· Young, M.T.; Brusatte, S.L.; Ruta, M. & de Andrade, M.B. (2010). The evolution of Metriorhynchoidea (mesoeucrocodylia, thalattosuchia): an integrated approach using geometric morphometrics, analysis of disparity, and biomechanics. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 158: 801-859. CrossRef

· Zelditch, M.L.; Swiderski, D.L.; Sheets, H.D. & Fink, W.L. (2004). Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.

· Zuffi, M.A.L.; Sacchi, R.; Pupin, F. & Cencetti, T. (2011). Sexual size and shape dimorphism in the Moorish gecko (Tarentola mauritanica, Gekkota, Phyllodactylidae). North-Western Journal of Zoology 7: 189-197.